On Sunday, March 31st, 2024, the Koocheh YouTube channel posted a video discussing current events in Iran. During one segment, Koocheh aired Masood Rajavi’s assertion that the Americans wanted to remove King Reza Pahlavi the Great as the head of state of Iran. The King allegedly pleaded with the Americans for his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince and Heir of Iran, to be the new King of Iran. The British accepted this proposal and allowed Mohammad Reza Pahlavi to become the next King of Iran.
Masood Rajavi deceived his audience by employing the hasty generalization fallacy (the overgeneralization fallacy). This fallacy involves making a claim based on insufficient evidence. To make a valid claim, you need to provide sufficient examples. In other words, you can only assert that something is true if you have substantial evidence to support it.
What Rajavi said was not even close to an actual historical event. During World War II, Iran declared itself a neutral state and did not want to be involved in World War II. England and Russia wanted to steal Iran’s black gold and besmirched the King of Kings, Reza Pahlavi the Great, under the pretext of being Nazi collaborators.
The Imperial Iranian Armed Forces could not protect Iran’s national sovereignty, and the King had no choice but to step down from the Peacock Throne. At the time, the Prime Minister of Iran, His Excellency Mohammad Ali Foroughi, suggested that the King abdicate the throne in favour of his son. While the British aimed to restore the Qajar dynasty to power, the heir to Ahmad Shah Qajar, Hamid Hassan Mirza, was a British subject who did not speak Persian. Thus, with the help of Foroughi, Crown Prince Mohammad Reza Pahlavi took the oath to become the new Shah of Iran.
Now, the facts are in place, and you can see for yourself why Qajar Prince Hamid Hassan Mirza could not become the head of state of Iran because Iranians did not want him and not because the British wanted Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as the Monarch of Iran.
End note:
The Little Brown Book, fifth edition, page 144.
“Iran and the Rise of Reza Shah: From the Collapse of the Qajar Dynasty to the Emergence of Pahlavi Power.”
On Saturday, March 30th, 2024, @pouriazeraati, from his Twitter account, posted a picture of himself on a hospital bed, holding his right hand up and showing the letter V for victory.
On Sunday, March 31, 2024, he wrote on his Twitter account “آنكس كه حقيقت را نمى داند تنها يك ناآگاه است. آنكس كه حقيقت را مى داند و آن را انكار مى كند و يا وارونه جلوه مى دهد، تبهكار است- برتولت فريدريش برشت” . However, he did plagiarism by not crediting the owner of this thought. “He who does not know the truth is just ignorant. The one who knows the truth, denies it, or makes it look upside down is a criminal—Bertolt Friedrich Brecht.”
He claims that an assassin attacked him with a blade and escaped away from the jaw of death.
Let’s analyze why the stories of #England, #IranInternational, and @pouriazeraati lack credibility.
Let’s talk about the brutality of England against Iran from W. Morgan Shuster’s perspective as he narrates in his book “The Strangling of Persia.” In his book, he talks about how England used Iran’s weakness to destroy Iran, such as in “The Great Game,” where England caused Iran to lose its land to Russia. Even to this very day, England has not given up on its ambition to destroy Iran. The prime example is the Guadeloupe Conference of 1979, which explains how England, France, Germany and the USA conspired to aid Khomeini and his followers to gain power in Iran by using acts of terrorism. There is a video clip of Sadegh Ziba Kallam, who went to England to pursue higher education and decided to join the terrorist organization to cause social disorder in Iran by employing tools of terrorism. During the post-collapse of the Pahlavi Dynasty, England became his second home, and his daughter went to England without observing the headscarf rule of Islam while other Iranian women were facing death sentences like Mahsa Amini, who lost her life because her hair was slightly out of her headscarf.
Let’s talk about Saudi Arabia, which launched Iran International as a soft war measure against the Islamic Republic of Iran. The regime in Iran does not have the consent and the will of Iranians to govern. The lack of confidence in the state of the Islamic Republic of Iran is a clear indication that the Islamic Republic of Iran is vulnerable to internal threats. The nature of the Islamic Republic of Iran is a totalitarian regime. The regime is supporting Houthi rebel groups to clash with Saudi Arabia. In return, Saudi Arabia is using Iran International to foment unrest in Iran by supporting Iranian separatists.
Once, it became clear to Iranians that Iran International was acting like England and wanted to divide Iran among its ethnic groups. Iranians began to boycott Iran International. The popularity of Iran International began to plummet, and viewership declined. Iran International is seeking the attention of Iranians by claiming that the Islamic Republic of Iran is contemplating an act of terrorism against its Iran International staff. However, the #Manoto Television program, which revived Iran’s national identity, the Islamic Republic of Iran, did not do an act of terrorism against its staff.
Let’s look at Pouria Zeraati’s #pouriazeraati claim that he says one assassin from the Islamic Republic of Iran used a blade to end his life. However, he walked away with minor injuries.
Let’s look at the conflict scene:
When people are under attack, they have visual impairment and auditory exclusion.
An assassin has about 30 seconds to do its job and escape a crime scene. As a result, they are positioning themselves in the right direction to do their job and run away from the crime scene.
In this case, an assassin would walk behind Pouria Zeraati and kick their dominant knee to immobilize him because he would go down and rest on his knees; now, he is on his knees and cannot run anywhere. Therefore, an assassin uses its element of surprise, and Pouria does not know what is happening and is suffering from visual impairment and auditory exclusion. An assassin would use one hand, move their forehead backward and slash their throat in a semi-circular way. The targets are the main arteries. As a result, as his heart is pumping, his blood would flow out of his body and would live a short time.
He claims that he survived the assassination. In that case, he fought with the assassin. The palms of his hands do not have any sign of a cut. His body does not have any sign of trauma.
An assassin would not target his belly because stab wounds to the stomach make it hard to pull the knife out. During combat, when soldiers are going into melee and are using their assault rifles with fixed bayonets, the knife lodges in the human body and opens fire their assault rifle to pull the knife out of the human body. A human cage works as a shelter and would prevent most injuries. The places that the assassin would attack were his shoulders and between his legs because of the large blood vessels. The last spot would be his kidneys, a hard target to hit. As you can see in this picture of him, he has no sign of trauma except one paper cut on his left finger. He can ask his mom to kiss that finger, and he will be fine.
On March 31st, 2024, he wrote a quote: “He who does not know the truth is just ignorant. The one who knows the truth, denies it, or makes it look upside down is a criminal—Bertolt Friedrich Brecht.” He did not credit the author of the quote. He steals people’s ideas.
Indeed, Iranians have reached an age of maturity that his little hocus pocus cannot fool Iranians. He makes up stories and thinks everyone will believe him.
As a result, the history of England, Saudi Arabia’s Iran International and Pouria Zeraati lacked credibility at all times because they have a long history of destroying Iran, and now they are lost in space; they are looking for a venue to gain public attention. However, they are the losers of the liberation of Iran.
I am working on a blogging project and have created a section titled “Embodiment of Lies,” which refers to someone who habitually tells untruths. Western countries put Khomeini in power in Iran and created a world of anarchy because of this.
In this section, I will briefly review “The Man in the Mirror: A True Story of Love, Revolution and Treachery in Iran” by Carole Jerome.
In her book, Carole Jerome attempts to convince her readers that she was not a spy but rather in love with Sadegh Ghotbzadeh. She clarifies that Ghotbzadeh was not a communist but a nationalist. In the end, Ghotbzadeh was the man in the Persian Mirror that he desired, not the Mirror that Jerome had envisioned.
Throughout history, Russia has been a potential threat to the safety and security of Iran and has always had a plan to defeat Iran. During World War II, the Russian army invaded Iran, claiming that Reza Pahlavi the Great had collaborated with Nazi Germany. Even after the war ended, Russia did not withdraw its army from Iran. To counter this, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi I deployed the Imperial Iranian Armed Forces in Azerbaijan province, and the Russian military eventually moved back to its national border. However, Russia did not give up on its plan to conquer Iran. In the 1950s, Iran was going through a period of turmoil due to the nationalization of Iran’s oil. The Communist Tudeh Party was planning to assist The Red Army in conquering Iran while Mossadiq was the Prime Minister of Iran.
During the time when the Tudeh Party was causing unrest in Iran, Iranian nationalists took to the streets to prevent the Red Army from entering Iran and suppressing the Tudeh Party. As a result, Mossadiq was arrested and later found guilty by a military tribunal. However, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi I commuted his sentence to house arrest since Mossadiq was staying at his home and could not leave. Later on, Sadegh Ghotbzadeh was asked by his father to help Mossadiq, which eventually led him into the world of politics.
Sadegh Ghotbzadeh collaborated with the PLO, Syria, and Libyan leaders to overthrow the Pahlavi Dynasty. Due to their adoption of a left-wing ideology, he was labelled a communist.
The writer was attempting to demonstrate that Ghotbzadeh was not a communist and that the Israeli intelligence service had wrongly portrayed him as one. In reality, Ghotbzadeh was a nationalist who, at the eleventh hour, had hoped to orchestrate a coup to transform Iran from a theocratic state into a secular one to save the country.
The author confessed that they were in an open relationship and dating other people, which made it clear that Jerome was spying on Ghotbzadeh. On page 292, the author mentions that after the announcement of the execution, American surveillance intercepted a phone call from Ahmad to Reyshahri. This suggests that the author was a journalist who gathered information from various people and sold it to the intelligence community.
According to the author, Ghotbzadeh was a devout Muslim who initially believed in Khomeini’s leadership. However, there came a moment when he began to doubt Khomeini’s intentions for Iran. The story reached its climax when the hostage crisis did not go according to Ghotbzadeh’s plan, and he failed to extradite the former Iranian ruler, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi I, back to Iran. In response, Ghotbzadeh decided to stage a coup to overthrow the theocratic regime in Iran. The coup was uncovered, and the plotters were executed by firing squad.
The Man in the Mirror is a story about Ghotbzadeh. It highlights that you see your reflection when you look at yourself in the mirror. Ghotbzadeh’s message was that if you want to improve the world, you must start with yourself. You can make a difference by standing up for what you believe in, no matter how small. It all begins with you.
On page 296 of the book, the author finally realizes that the person she was hoping for is not who she thought he was. Instead, she compares him to a Persian mirror, referencing the Epic Kings of Ferdowsi, where Rostam, father of Sohrab, kills his own son, similar to how Khomeini killed his son Ghotbzadeh.
Many Iranians are leaving their homeland for safety, security, and economic reasons and are settling in a new country. However, despite being hurt emotionally and physically by the Iranian regime, they do not turn their back on their motherland. In their new home, they are busy with their daily commitments, but they still make extra time to pursue countless opportunities that can bring hope, joy, and a bright future to Iran.
Iranians tend to be kind to others due to their cultural conditioning, which can be seen as a weakness by Western politicians who may try to exploit it. Iranian people believe that the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) poses a threat to the safety and security of Western countries, and they want to help defend these countries. They believe that a peaceful world, where safety and security are ensured, is the ideal state to live in.
I, like anyone else, made a substantial political miscalculation that we thought the #USA’s foreign policy was pursuing global peace and the Islamic Republic of Iran’s (IRI) foreign policy of terrorism was in paradox with the US foreign policy.
As time passed, an average Joe like me observed the US and Western countries in action regarding the IRI foreign policy interaction. It became evident that the US and Western countries wanted the IRI to engage in terrorist activities because they were supporting their military-industrial complex.
There is another political miscalculation from Iranians, who are running for political office, hoping to isolate the IRI in the international community.
Let’s take the example of an Iranian citizen who is deeply passionate about the freedom of their country and cares for other Iranians who advocate for either a republic or a constitutional monarchy. Let’s assume that this person acts selflessly and has no personal interests in the matter. Once someone is elected to an office and becomes a political party member, they are expected to follow the party’s policy platform on which they were elected.
Canada’s powerful individuals have sanctioned the party’s political agenda. These elites do not wish to see Iran released from the IRI because the IRI elements have made Canada their economic home. Due to this, Iranians are suffering from financial difficulties, not Canadians. In essence, Canada is profiting from permitting the IRI elements to store Iran’s wealth in Canada, and therefore, there is no need to have a conflict with the IRI.
As a result, Iranians need to look inside themselves for the liberation of Iran from the oppressive regime of the IRI and not seek help from outsiders to topple the IRI because the outsiders do not have the best interest for Iran.
On October 12th, 2022, Patrick Bet-David posted a video titled “Will Iran Become A Democracy Or Return To A Monarchy?“
There is an issue with what he is saying: there is a difference between democracy and monarchy. Democracy is a doctrine or principle of a healthy and vibrant political life. However, a monarchy state is not a doctrine system but the foundation of a country’s sovereignty.
This paper aims to briefly distinguish how the doctrine of democracy differs from a monarchy state.
What is democracy?
Democracy is a Greek word meaning the rule of the people. It is not a form of state. It is not a form of government.
This means that people will decide on their own decisions and foreign policies.
Consequently, democracy is the notion that state actors will ensure the welfare and well-being of citizens.
What is a monarchy state?
A monarchy state is a form of state where power is centralized in the hands of one person. Unfortunately, history has shown that this type of governance often leads to the state’s failure. However, Monarch Reza Pahlavi II of Iran is a constitutional monarch, meaning the power is not solely in his hands. Instead, it is dispersed among state actors such as the legislative body.
In conclusion, any form of state, whether a republic state or a constitutional monarchy state, needs a constitution with enforceable actors to ensure the well-being of citizens.
It is evident that he intentionally misled his listeners into thinking that a monarchy state is associated with an oppressive regime. Thus, he spreads fear and havoc among listeners to distance themselves from Monarch Reza Pahlavi II. However, Iranians remained steadfast with the Pahlavi Dynasty until the Iranian will have a national referendum to decide whether to have a republic or constitutional monarchy state.
Let’s talk about Peeping Tom (Voyeur) Mullah Mohammad Esmaeili. He was in a clinic in the holy city of Qom, which manufactures mullahs faster than the sun’s light. He was in an office, opened the door, and saw a mother on her knees, breastfeeding her infant child in her arms. He quickly pulled his smartphone from the upper side of his jacket’s pocket and began taking pictures of a mother who was nursing her child.
When the mom learned that caring for her child became an opportunity for Peeping Tom Mohammad Esmaeili, she walked toward the voyeur, Mullah Mohammad Esmaeili. She asked the mullah to delete the pictures from his phone. The mullah did not want to lose those pictures because they were part of his plan to gratify himself.
The incident caused a severe commotion in the clinic lobby as other women took sides with the mom and tried to take the phone from the mullah and delete the pictures from his phone.
Let’s look at the side of a genuine religious person would do. Let’s say a spiritual person sees a mother on her knees, which is causing discomfort for her, and is breastfeeding her infant child in a problematic body position. A religious person wants to provide care for people, and this was a golden moment to serve God. A spiritual person would invite the mother to a private office, or a religious person would stand in front of the mother and face the opposite of the mom and would provide privacy for the mom.
As you can see for yourself, Mullah Mohammad Esmaeili is not a religious person and does not care about the well-being of others. Mullah Mohammad Esmaeili, like any other mullahs, is thinking about their sexual gratification by exploiting other people. They are not following the path of God; they are following the path of Allah, and the mullahs are preaching Satan’s words to people.
Toronto Transit Commission is facing economic hardship because patrons use its transit system without paying. To deter people from not paying fares and using its transit system, the Toronto Transit Commission is calling for higher fines.
Does the Toronto Transit Commission have a law to fine fare evaders? Yes, it does. Then, why does it not work? People know that they will have a brush with the law, and it is a severe criminal offence. Why are they taking risks? People are evading transit fares because they do not have money. Their money is going to skyrocketing house rents and the price of food.
The reality comes down to this point: as long as politicians are not accepting responsibility for fixing Canada’s housing crisis and stopping Loblaws from exploiting people, the crime rate will increase in Canada, and no one can do anything about it.
There has been a recent increase in crime in Toronto, Ontario, with individuals resorting to using deadly weapons to steal cars. During a town meeting, a spokesperson for the Toronto Police Service (TPS) advised citizens to hand over their car keys to thieves and not attempt to be a hero. This advice has caused public concern, with many feeling that the police are not doing enough to address the issue and are giving in to criminal activity.
Let’s analyze the situation. Several individuals are holding deadly weapons and would not hesitate to use lethal force to take a car from its owner. Is it worth risking your life or suffering a severe injury over a vehicle? Remember that cars are replaceable, and insurance companies will compensate the owner.
Why are people committing crimes? Because they are hopeless, they do not see a bright future ahead of themselves and rely on breaking laws to live another day.
The question is, how did we get to this point of anarchy? People are homeless because the price of renting is skyrocketing, and they are hungry due to the high cost of food.
As a result, people need to vote during election time for a political party with a real plan to solve the economic crisis in Canada. Otherwise, the situation will get worse and never be solved. Last, the political solution to the financial crisis is not political ideology. Still, everyone must put aside their ego, ideology, and self-interest and work for the best interests of Canada.
In 1979, the US, France, England, and West Germany wanted to plunge the world into a global crisis. The above entities targeted the Middle Eastern nations due to the source of black gold (oil). Black gold was a source of national income for the Middle Eastern nations and would ensure the Western country’s war machines would have funds to operate. Furthermore, the Western countries did not want the Middle Eastern nations to prosper and tried to keep them in the dark ages. The best way to keep them in the dark ages is to install Khomeini, who said economic faculty is for donkeys. Therefore, he would waste Iran’s black gold and other natural resources and would do what the US and the Western countries told him to do.
Khomeini has passed away, and as a result, Iranians have come to realize how Western countries exploited them. Many Iranians are now determined to overthrow the Islamic Republic of Iran and have a national referendum to allow them to choose between a constitutional monarchy or a republic state.
The USA and the Western countries do not want to lose their prize possession, which is the Islamic Republic of Iran. The above entities want to make sure the Islamic Republic of Iran remains in power to profit from the bloodbath in the Middle East.
The US has several times promoted #Faezeh #Rafsanjan as an alternative leader for Iranians. A rational person begins to ask why the US and the Western countries installed Khomeini in power and caused global chaos. During #IranContraAffair, Hashemi Rafsanjani was communicating secretly with the US to purchase ordinates at black market value for Iran. Once it was exposed, the US began to deny it without expecting anyone to believe them. Mullah Rafsanjani was involved in several assassinations in Iran and outside of Iran. Post the 1979 Revolution, he stole Iran’s wealth and stashed it in the US and Canada. As a result, the US, Canada and other Western countries love their stooge and want their daughter to become a leader in Iran to prolong the Islamic Republic of Iran.
In conclusion, #HashemiRafsanjani was a petite, common criminal who worked for the US, Canada, and other Western countries. He stole Iran’s wealth and stashed it in countries like Canada and the US; # Faezeh #Rafsanjan, daughter of Hashemi, comes from the Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves family. The @USABehFarsi does not want to lose $$$ and promotes Faezeh as an alternative leader of Iran. The True Leader of Iran is Monarch @PahlaviReza II, who has the votes, the consent and the will of Iranians to lead Iran toward the liberation of Iran from the oppressive regime in Iran.
House of Intellectual 